-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use impl substs in #[rustc_on_unimplemented]
#94689
Merged
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
compiler-errors:on-unimplemented-substs
Mar 9, 2022
Merged
Use impl substs in #[rustc_on_unimplemented]
#94689
bors
merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
compiler-errors:on-unimplemented-substs
Mar 9, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
label
Mar 7, 2022
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 7, 2022
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
on-unimplemented-substs
branch
from
March 7, 2022 02:41
a96d38d
to
f860cec
Compare
compiler-errors
commented
Mar 7, 2022
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
on-unimplemented-substs
branch
from
March 7, 2022 02:44
f860cec
to
e9ddb8f
Compare
compiler-errors
commented
Mar 7, 2022
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ | |||
// test for #87707 | |||
// edition:2018 | |||
// run-fail | |||
// exec-env:RUST_BACKTRACE=0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Drive-by so I don't keep accidentally changing the output of issue-87707.run.stderr
because my environment has RUST_BACKTRACE=full
by default.
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit b726bfb has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 8, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#94689 (Use impl substs in `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]`) - rust-lang#94714 (Enable `close_read_wakes_up` test on Windows) - rust-lang#94723 (Add core::hint::must_use) - rust-lang#94724 (unix: Avoid name conversions in `remove_dir_all_recursive`) - rust-lang#94730 (Reverted atomic_mut_ptr feature removal causing compilation break) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We were using the trait-ref substs instead of impl substs in
rustc_on_unimplemented
, even when computing therustc_on_unimplemented
attached to an impl block. Let's not do that.This PR also untangles impl and trait def-ids in the logic in
on_unimplemented
a bit.Fixes #94675